🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in progressive politics and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his deep dives into city data and voter surveys.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – accurately predicting that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, for instance, the divide between the “commie corridor”, running from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, certain media outlets and financial newspapers surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping approximately 200K ballots into the system frequently! I felt a little nervous initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but came large groups of ballots added later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

Understand, there was a world where yesterday turned out kind of poorly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the first round.

Expanding Support

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He assembled the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, young leftists, and immigrant groups. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: multiracial, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a real thing, confined to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Muslims. Voters in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year backed Zohran now. But I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Impact

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than I had expected. I figured it could exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that was enough to win.

You predicted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not it’s definitive, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it so then no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any area. Including Tottenville in the borough, which is like an 88% Trump area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo held Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and then added all of these Republicans on the island with a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of tactical voting by GOP voters. This happened prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It might have changed the outcome if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the property owners and residents supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. However overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between 77% and 83% in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Upper East Side, his position on Israel was influential in those places. Similarly in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in the borough, they were strongly supportive. So it’s unclear if existed crazy narrative-busters on this one, but Mamdani did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what New York means politically? Will the progressive base serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that key political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – people will emerge from these neighborhoods to be elevated nationally.

However I think that each urban center in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.